Open access operator plans Edinburgh-Cardiff service<\/h5>\n

\u00a0
GUT\u2019s Cardiff to Edinburgh services could use Class 222s<\/em><\/p>\n

\u00a0
\nGrand Union Trains is seeking access rights to run the first open access passenger services which would exclude London. It says its proposed services between Cardiff and Edinburgh via Birmingham would provide a much-needed uplift in capacity and cheaper fares.<\/p>\n

All current open access services operate to and from London, as did the short-lived Wrexham to Marylebone operation. GUT aims to introduce London to Stirling and London to Carmarthen services in the next two years, and is now developing plans for five Cardiff to Edinburgh trains per day in each direction from late 2025.<\/p>\n

A co-operative company called Go-op proposed services in Wiltshire and Somerset more than a decade ago but they never came to fruition. It reiterated its plans last year.<\/p>\n

The latest proposals from GUT and Wrexham, Shropshire & Midlands Railway come as ministers indicate a more supportive government stance on open access than in the past. Rail minister Huw Merriman, a long-time advocate of open access, attended an open access summit last month.<\/p>\n

We will support more open access services where it benefits passengers and taxpayers. We\u2019ve seen this work well with Hull Trains and Grand Central as well as with Lumo<\/p>\n

In his George Bradshaw address in February, transport secretary Mark Harper said: \u201cWe will support more open access services where it benefits passengers and taxpayers. We\u2019ve seen this work well with Hull Trains and Grand Central as well as with Lumo.\u201d These services offered passengers greater choice and more direct links, he said. \u201cOpen access operators will play an important role in the industry\u2019s future, especially as we grow new markets and make best use of spare capacity on the network.\u201d<\/p>\n

However, DfT-sponsored train operators have twice pre-empted GUT proposals. In September, the DfT announced that CrossCountry would launch a daily Cardiff to Edinburgh service as part of the operator\u2019s new direct award. This will be resourced primarily by combining existing Cardiff to Birmingham and Birmingham to Edinburgh trains.<\/p>\n

\u00a0
<\/a><\/p>\n

\u00a0
\nRegarding this innovation, GUT managing director Ian Yeowart told Passenger Transport: \u201cDespite the fact that it has been public since before us, we shared the information [about GUT\u2019s Cardiff-Edinburgh proposal] with the DfT in May. It\u2019s no coincidence that CrossCountry have looked to do something. The fact they\u2019ve gone out before us is with a view to it looking as though we\u2019re pinching their ideas.\u201d<\/p>\n

However, the DfT said CrossCountry had presented its idea for a Cardiff to Edinburgh return service to the Department over a year ago, well before any open access application for this corridor was known.<\/p>\n

GUT\u2019s planned Carmarthen to London open access services were pre-empted in May when Great Western Railway extended more of its Swansea to London services to start at Carmarthen. Before GUT was granted access rights for Carmarthen to London, GWR had argued that the proposed services would involve \u201cmega-abstraction with little if any generation\u201d, on the grounds that there was little new revenue to be gained west of Swansea.<\/p>\n

I despair when I see a four-car train going through York packed, going to Plymouth or Penzance,<\/p>\n

Yeowart said CrossCountry\u2019s new service would not deter GUT because CrossCountry was providing insufficient capacity on its core sections of route. \u201cI despair when I see a four-car train going through York packed, going to Plymouth or Penzance,\u201d he said.<\/p>\n

\u201cWe\u2019ve been working on Cardiff to Edinburgh for a long time. We discussed it with the DfT. To be fair to them, they think it\u2019s desperately needed.\u201d<\/p>\n

GUT would initially use Class 222\/223 diesel units. Its application says GUT would provide around one million additional seats annually along this route. <\/p>\n

We will bring in competition to the eye-watering charges on the route, which is why a lot of people go via London to South Wales<\/p>\n

Yeowart said: \u201cWe will bring in competition to the eye-watering charges on the route, which is why a lot of people go via London to South Wales [from the North East and Edinburgh].\u201d<\/p>\n

GUT\u2019s application says that \u201cticket prices between various ECML locations and South Wales are particularly expensive with walk on anytime single fares between York and Cardiff for example at \u00a3161.80 and \u00a3359.40 1st class. Between Edinburgh and Cardiff, the walk on single fare is \u00a3233.20. A 1st class walk on single is \u00a3429.00. All these services do of course require a change of train at present.\u201d<\/p>\n

Passenger Transport<\/em> asked the DfT whether it was behaving hypocritically by publicly supporting open access while allowing two of its sponsored train operators to pre-empt planned open access services. <\/p>\n

A DfT spokesperson responded: \u201cThis claim is simply untrue \u2013 all applications are considered in a fair and open process, based on providing passengers better value for money and more efficient services.\u201d<\/p>\n

The DfT also said that the government had not objected to GUT\u2019s proposals to operate Carmarthen services. Its response to the ORR\u2019s consultation in 2021 concluded: \u201cIn summary, the Department considers the application is primarily abstractive in nature, impacting on taxpayers funding of the railway at a time when rail revenue nationally is extremely constrained. It would have a substantial and overall negative effect for passengers on (an already crowded in normal circumstances) GWML network in relation to capacity and performance, on an area of the network which is already well serviced by passenger services, which support the connectivity of our Union. We consider that these impacts must be examined in detail as the application is considered.\u201d<\/p>\n

\u00a0
This article appears in the latest issue of\u00a0Passenger Transport<\/em>.<\/strong><\/p>\n

DON\u2019T MISS OUT \u2013 GET YOUR COPY! \u2013\u00a0click here to subscribe!<\/a><\/strong><\/p>\n

<\/a><\/p>\n

The post Grand Union applies to run non-London trains<\/a> first appeared on Passenger Transport<\/a>.<\/p>\n

\u200b\u00a0<\/p>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Open access operator plans Edinburgh-Cardiff service \u00a0GUT\u2019s Cardiff to Edinburgh services could use Class 222s \u00a0 Grand Union Trains is seeking access rights to run the first open access passenger services which would exclude London. It says its proposed services between Cardiff and Edinburgh via Birmingham would provide a much-needed uplift in capacity and cheaper fares. All current open access…<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":0,"featured_media":3553,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[60],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-3552","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-camcab"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/camcab.co.uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3552","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/camcab.co.uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/camcab.co.uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/camcab.co.uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=3552"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/camcab.co.uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3552\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/camcab.co.uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/3553"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/camcab.co.uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=3552"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/camcab.co.uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=3552"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/camcab.co.uk\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=3552"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}